Oades, Robert D.; Dittmann-Balcar, Alexandra; Schepker, Renate; Eggers, Christian; Zerbin, Dieter:
Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) and mismatch negativity (MMN) in healthy children and those with attention-deficit or Tourette/tic symptoms
In: Biological Psychology, Jg. 43 (1996), Heft 2, S. 163 - 185
1996Artikel/Aufsatz in ZeitschriftOA Grün
MedizinMedizinische Fakultät » Universitätsklinikum Essen » LVR-Klinikum Essen » Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie des Kindes- und Jugendalters
Damit verbunden: 1 Publikation(en)
Titel:
Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) and mismatch negativity (MMN) in healthy children and those with attention-deficit or Tourette/tic symptoms
Autor*in:
Oades, Robert D.UDE
GND
1208788639
LSF ID
29685
ORCID
0000-0001-6151-5559ORCID iD
Sonstiges
der Hochschule zugeordnete*r Autor*in
;
Dittmann-Balcar, Alexandra;Schepker, RenateUDE
GND
114621632
LSF ID
29695
Sonstiges
der Hochschule zugeordnete*r Autor*in
;
Eggers, ChristianUDE
GND
143936913
LSF ID
47366
Sonstiges
der Hochschule zugeordnete*r Autor*in
;
Zerbin, Dieter
Erscheinungsjahr:
1996
Open Access?:
OA Grün
DuEPublico 1 ID

Abstract:

The study compares 5 auditory event-related potential (ERP) components (P1 to P3) after 3 tones differing in pitch and rarity, and contrasts the mismatch negativity (MMN) between them in 12 children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; mean 10.2 years of age), 12 healthy controls pairwise matched for age (controls), and 10 with Chronic Tic or Tourette Syndrome (TS). Topographic recordings were derived from 19 scalp electrodes. Four major effects are reported. (a) Shorter latencies in ADHD patients were evident as early as 100 ms. (b) Both ADHD and TS groups showed very large P2 components where the maxima were shifted anteriorly. The differences in the later potentials were of a topographical nature. (c) Frontal MMN was non-significantly larger in the ADHD group but normalized data showed a left rather than a right frontal bias as in control subjects. Maxima for TS were usually posterior. (d) ADHD patients did not show the usual right-biased P3 asymmetry nor the frontal versus parietal P3 latency difference. From these results it is suggested that ADHD patients process perceptual information faster from an early stage (N1). Further, along with the TS group, ADHD patients showed an unusually marked inhibitory phase in processing (P2), interpreted as a reduction of the normal controls on further processing. Later indices of stimulus processing (N2-P3) showed a frontal impairment in TS and a right hemisphere impairment in ADHD patients. These are interpreted in terms of the difficulties in sustaining attention experienced by both ADHD and TS patients.