Sommer, Ilka; Assa, Solmaz; Bachmann, Cadja; Chen, Wei; Elcin, Melih; Funk, Elisabeth; Kamisli, Caner; Liu, Tao; Maass, Alexander H.; Merse, Stefanie; Morbach, Caroline; Neumann, Anja; Neumann, Till; Quasinowski, Benjamin; Störk, Stefan; Weiß, Anja et al:
Medical Care as Flea Market Bargaining? An International Interdisciplinary Study of Varieties of Shared Decision Making in Physician–Patient Interactions
In: Teaching and Learning in Medicine (TLM) (2024), in press
2024article/chapter in journalOA Hybrid
Sociology, Social SciencesFaculty of Social Sciences » Department of Sociology (IfS)
Related: 1 publication(s)
Title in English:
Medical Care as Flea Market Bargaining? An International Interdisciplinary Study of Varieties of Shared Decision Making in Physician–Patient Interactions
Author:
Sommer, IlkaUDE
GND
1059413795
LSF ID
57778
ORCID
0000-0002-4595-3724ORCID iD
Other
connected with university
;
Assa, Solmaz
;
Bachmann, Cadja
;
Chen, Wei
;
Elcin, Melih
;
Funk, Elisabeth
;
Kamisli, Caner
;
Liu, Tao
;
Maass, Alexander H.
;
Merse, Stefanie
;
Morbach, Caroline
;
Neumann, Anja
;
Neumann, Till
;
Quasinowski, BenjaminUDE
LSF ID
59957
ORCID
0000-0002-3635-0200ORCID iD
Other
connected with university
;
Störk, Stefan
;
Weingartz, Sarah
;
Wietasch, Götz
;
Chen (陈未), Wei;Liu (刘涛), Tao;Weiß, AnjaUDE
GND
1031779833
GND
133770869
LSF ID
49375
ORCID
0000-0002-9676-8326ORCID iD
Other
connected with university
corresponding author
Year of publication:
2024
Open Access?:
OA Hybrid
Scopus ID
Language of text:
English
Keyword, Topic:
international comparison ; patient contribution ; Physician–patient communication ; physician–patient interaction ; shared decision making
Type of resource:
Text

Abstract in English:

Phenomenon: Shared decision making (SDM) is a core ideal in the interaction between healthcare providers and patients, but the implementation of the SDM ideal in clinical routines has been a relatively slow process. Approach: In a sociological study, 71 interactions between physicians and simulated patients enacting chronic heart failure were video-recorded in China, Germany, the Netherlands, and Turkey as part of a quasi-experimental research design. Participating physicians varied in specialty and level of experience. The secondary analysis presented in this article used content analysis to study core components of SDM in all of the 71 interactions and a grounded theory approach to observe how physicians responded actively to patients even though they did not actively employ the SDM ideal. Findings: Full realization of the SDM ideal remains an exception, but various aspects of SDM in physician–patient interaction were observed in all four locations. Analyses of longer interactions show dynamic processes of interaction that sometimes surprised both patient and physician. We observed varieties of SDM that differ from the SDM ideal but arguably achieve what the SDM ideal is intended to achieve. Our analysis suggests a need to revisit the SDM ideal—to consider whether varieties of SDM may be acceptable, even valuable, in their own right. Insights: The gap between the SDM ideal and SDM as implemented in clinical practice may in part be explained by the tendency of medicine to define and teach SDM through a narrow lens of checklist evaluations. The authors support the argument that SDM defies a checklist approach. SDM is not uniform, but nuanced, dependent on circumstances and setting. As SDM is co-produced by patients and physicians in a dynamic process of interaction, medical researchers should consider and medical learners should be exposed to varieties of SDM-related practice rather than a single idealized model. Observing and discussing worked examples contributes to the physician’s development of realistic expectations and personal professional growth.