von der Beck, Birte; Wißmann, Andreas; Tolba, Rene H.; Dammann, Philip; Hilken, Gero:
What Can Laboratory Animal Facility Managers Do to Improve the Welfare of Laboratory Animals and Laboratory Animal Facility Staff? A German Perspective
In: Animals, Vol. 14 (2024), No. 7, Article 1136
2024article/chapter in journalOA Gold
MedicineFaculty of Medicine » Essen University Hospital » Zentrales Tierlaboratorium
Related: 1 publication(s)
Title in English:
What Can Laboratory Animal Facility Managers Do to Improve the Welfare of Laboratory Animals and Laboratory Animal Facility Staff? A German Perspective
Author:
von der Beck, Birte
;
Wißmann, AndreasUDE
LSF ID
13479
LSF ID
51457
Other
connected with university
;
Tolba, Rene H.
;
Dammann, PhilipUDE
LSF ID
51455
Other
connected with university
corresponding author
;
Hilken, GeroUDE
LSF ID
12066
ORCID
0000-0002-3881-796XORCID iD
Other
connected with university
corresponding author
Year of publication:
2024
Open Access?:
OA Gold
Web of Science ID
PubMed ID
Scopus ID
Note:
CA Dammann und CA Hilken
Language of text:
English
Keyword, Topic:
animal welfare ; compassion fatigue ; culture of care ; human welfare
Type of resource:
Text

Abstract in English:

Laboratory animal facility managers must ensure that animal experiments can be carried out under optimal scientific conditions, that all legal requirements are met, and that animal welfare is maximized. Animal experimentation is stressful not only for the animals involved but also for the people who maintain these animals or carry out the experiments. Many of those involved find themselves in a constant conflict between scientific necessity, care, and harm. Under the term Culture of Care, procedures have been developed to reduce the burden of animal experimentation on the animals and the staff involved. The focus here is on what laboratory animal facility managers can do to improve the welfare of laboratory animals and the people working with them. Exemplary measures are the improvement of the housing conditions of laboratory animals, the introduction of uniform handling measures, clear and transparent structures via a quality management system, implementation of a no-blame culture of error (e.g., via Critical Incident Reporting System in Laboratory Animal Science [CIRS-LAS]), and open and respectful communication with all parties involved in animal experimentation, including the public and representatives of the authorities (public webpage, open house policy). The 6 Rs must be considered at all times: replacement, reduction, refinement, respect, responsibility, and reproducibility. We are writing this article from the perspective of laboratory animal facility managers in Germany.