Frank, Ulrich:
Multi-level modeling: cornerstones of a rationale : Comparative evaluation, integration with programming languages, and dissemination strategies
In: Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM), Jg. 21 (2022), Heft 2, S. 451 - 480
2022Artikel/Aufsatz in ZeitschriftOA Hybrid
WirtschaftswissenschaftenInformatikFakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften » Fachgebiet Wirtschaftsinformatik » Wirtschaftsinformatik und Unternehmensmodellierung
Damit verbunden: 1 Publikation(en)
Titel in Englisch:
Multi-level modeling: cornerstones of a rationale : Comparative evaluation, integration with programming languages, and dissemination strategies
Autor*in:
Frank, UlrichUDE
LSF ID
12225
ORCID
0000-0002-8057-1836ORCID iD
Sonstiges
der Hochschule zugeordnete*r Autor*in
Erscheinungsjahr:
2022
Open Access?:
OA Hybrid
Web of Science ID
Scopus ID
Sprache des Textes:
Englisch
Schlagwort, Thema:
Essential design conflicts ; Integration of models and code ; Multi-level dissemination strategies ; Multi-level programming languages ; Multi-perspective evaluation framework ; Essential design conflicts; Multi-perspective evaluation framework; Multi-level programming languages; Integration of models and code; Multi-level dissemination strategies

Abstract in Englisch:

This expert voice paper presents a comprehensive rationale of multi-level modeling. It aims not only at a systematic assessment of its prospects, but also at encouraging applications of multi-level modeling in business information systems and at providing a motivation for future research. The assessment is developed from a comparison of multi-level modeling with object-oriented, general-purpose modeling languages (GPMLs) and domain-specific modeling languages (DSMLs). To foster a differentiated evaluation, we propose a multi-perspective framework that accounts, among others, for essential design conflicts, different types of users, as well as economic aspects. Besides the assessment of the additional abstraction offered by multi-level modeling, the evaluation also identifies specific drawbacks and remaining challenges. Based on the results of the comparative assessment, in order to foster the adoption and further development of multi-level modeling, we discuss the prospects of supplementing multi-level modeling languages with multi-level programming languages and suggest possible dissemination strategies customized for different groups of users. The paper concludes with an outline of future research.