Kerres, Michael; Buchner, Josef:
Education after the Pandemic : What We Have (Not) Learned about Learning
In: Education Sciences, Jg. 12 (2022), Heft 5, Artikel 315
2022Artikel/Aufsatz in ZeitschriftOA Gold
ErziehungswissenschaftenFakultät für Bildungswissenschaften » Institut für Berufs- und Weiterbildung (IBW)
Damit verbunden: 1 Publikation(en)
Titel in Englisch:
Education after the Pandemic : What We Have (Not) Learned about Learning
Autor*in:
Kerres, MichaelUDE
GND
111006325
LSF ID
2809
ORCID
0000-0002-7419-3023ORCID iD
Sonstiges
der Hochschule zugeordnete*r Autor*in
korrespondierende*r Autor*in
;
Buchner, JosefUDE
LSF ID
60696
ORCID
0000-0001-7637-885XORCID iD
Sonstiges
der Hochschule zugeordnete*r Autor*in
Erscheinungsjahr:
2022
Open Access?:
OA Gold
Web of Science ID
Scopus ID
Notiz:
CA Kerres
Sprache des Textes:
Englisch
Schlagwort, Thema:
educational technology ; future ; pandemic ; social construction

Abstract in Englisch:

During the pandemic, educational technologies have become an essential tool to provide education at a distance. The paper outlines basic assumptions of research on the effects of the pandemic on education and points out methodological flaws when these effects are directly related to the pandemic or to effects of educational technology on learning. Studies cannot be easily aggre-gated and must consider the institutional, national and cultural conditions of how the educational system reacted to the pandemic. The article discusses how the experiences during the pandemic will shape the future discussion of education after the pandemic. With regard to the use of digital tech-nology, the future seems widely open and will largely depend on the interpretation and re-construc-tion of these experiences during the pandemic by the actors in the field. Two contradictory visions for the role of educational technology in education after the pandemic seem possible: a pre-vs. post-digital view that imply fundamentally different perspectives for the future of education. A pre-dig-ital re-construction implies a return “back to normal”, whereas a post-digital view tries to utilize the experiences of the pandemic for a consequential reform of education.