Altmann, Tobias; Roth, Marcus:
Testing the social mindfulness paradigm : Longitudinal evidence of its unidimensionality, reliability, validity, and replicability in a sample of health care providers
In: PLoS ONE, Jg. 18 (2023), Heft 2 February, Artikel e0281738
2023Artikel/Aufsatz in ZeitschriftOA Gold
PsychologieFakultät für Bildungswissenschaften » Institut für Psychologie » Differentielle Psychologie
Damit verbunden: 1 Publikation(en)
Titel in Englisch:
Testing the social mindfulness paradigm : Longitudinal evidence of its unidimensionality, reliability, validity, and replicability in a sample of health care providers
Autor*in:
Altmann, TobiasUDE
LSF ID
52609
ORCID
0000-0001-7294-7808ORCID iD
Sonstiges
der Hochschule zugeordnete*r Autor*in
korrespondierende*r Autor*in
;
Roth, MarcusUDE
LSF ID
52324
ORCID
0000-0002-5676-8137ORCID iD
Sonstiges
der Hochschule zugeordnete*r Autor*in
Erscheinungsjahr:
2023
Open Access?:
OA Gold
PubMed ID
Scopus ID
Notiz:
CA Altmann
Sprache des Textes:
Englisch

Abstract in Englisch:

Objectives Social mindfulness is a relatively new concept in psychological research and is attracting increasing attention. Recent studies have provided evidence of its relevance with regard to prosocial behavior and empathy, but also concerning individual well-being and psychological health. In such studies, social mindfulness has been assessed using the social mindfulness paradigm by Van Doesum and colleagues, which is the standard measure of social mindfulness to date. However, evidence is scarce or lacking with regard to whether this measurement approach is unidimensional, whether it produces (test-retest) reliable and valid measurements, and whether its associations with personality and empathy are replicable. Methods To test these assumptions, we assessed a sample of 265 participants currently working in health care professions on social mindfulness, several concepts of empathy, and the HEXACO personality dimensions longitudinally at two measurement occasions. Results The results supported the assumption of unidimensionality of the measure. Partial support was found for its reliability, validity, and replicability. Test-retest reliability was acceptable, but the associations with personality and empathy turned out weaker than expected. Conclusions The social mindfulness paradigm is an interesting approach toward understanding social mindfulness, meaning mindfulness of other people’s needs. Potential directions for the further development of the social mindfulness paradigm and its network of relations, especially to empathy, are discussed.