Brandt, Hanne; Ehmke, Timo; Kuhl, Poldi; Leutner, Detlev:
Pre-service teachers’ ability to identify academic language features : The role of language-related opportunities to learn, and professional beliefs about linguistically responsive teaching
In: Language Awareness, Jg. 33 (2024), Heft 1, S. 70 - 93
2024Artikel/Aufsatz in ZeitschriftOA Hybrid
Allgemeines, SonstigesFakultät für Bildungswissenschaften » Institut für Psychologie » Lehr-Lernpsychologie
Damit verbunden: 1 Publikation(en)
Titel in Englisch:
Pre-service teachers’ ability to identify academic language features : The role of language-related opportunities to learn, and professional beliefs about linguistically responsive teaching
Autor*in:
Brandt, Hanne
ORCID
0000-0001-8877-5019ORCID iD
Sonstiges
korrespondierende*r Autor*in
;
Ehmke, Timo
ORCID
0000-0001-9572-2185ORCID iD
;
Kuhl, Poldi
ORCID
0000-0001-8021-8840ORCID iD
;
Leutner, DetlevUDE
GND
122012275
LSF ID
10558
ORCID
0000-0001-5308-9094ORCID iD
Sonstiges
der Hochschule zugeordnete*r Autor*in
Erscheinungsjahr:
2024
Open Access?:
OA Hybrid
Web of Science ID
Scopus ID
Sprache des Textes:
Englisch
Schlagwort, Thema:
Academic language features ; initial teacher education ; linguistic diversity ; linguistically responsive teaching ; opportunities to learn ; teacher beliefs
Ressourcentyp:
Text

Abstract in Englisch:

In order to reduce language-related disparities in educational attainment, teaching standards in many (Western) countries nowadays request teachers of all subjects and grades to focus on their students’ academic language development: Especially second language learners and socioeconomically disadvantaged students need continuous and systematic language support (linguistically responsive teaching) in order not to be left behind. To be able to act accordingly, (prospective) teachers need to acquire pedagogical language knowledge and develop positive beliefs about linguistically responsive teaching practices. Our cross-sectional survey among German pre-service teachers (n = 115) shows that–despite positive beliefs towards linguistically responsive teaching–hardly any of the participants had acquired a solid knowledge base in the area of educational linguistics: The majority could not identify a substantial amount of academic language features (known to be challenging especially for second language learners) in a content-specific explanatory text. This ability, however, is the basis for planning and carrying out linguistically responsive lessons. Although latent profile analyses show differences among the participants, many of them did not have opportunities to learn in the area of linguistic diversity during their studies. The results give rise to the question whether and how pedagogical language knowledge could become compulsory in teacher training.